Z. Svajda vs L. Broady Match result — 13.06.2026

Players Analysis

Zachary Svajda has shown a solid performance recently, particularly in the ATP London semi-finals where he defeated Liam Broady 2-0. His recent form indicates a win percentage of 60% over the last five matches, with a notable victory against a higher-ranked opponent in the French Open. On the other hand, Liam Broady has struggled lately, with a win percentage of only 40% in his last ten matches. This includes a recent loss to David Jorda Sanchis, which may affect his confidence going into this match.

Statistical Analysis & Influencing Factors

In their previous encounter, Svajda won convincingly with set scores of 7-5 and 6-2, showcasing his ability to perform under pressure. Svajda's serve has been reliable, with an ace percentage of 9.3% in recent matches, while Broady has a lower ace percentage of 3.7% and has struggled with double faults. The surface of grass tends to favor Svajda's playing style, as evidenced by his recent performances. Additionally, Svajda's higher overall Elo rating suggests he has a stronger long-term performance on grass compared to Broady.

Z. Svajda — L. Broady Prediction

Given the recent form and head-to-head results, Zachary Svajda is favored to win this match against Liam Broady. Svajda's consistent performance and ability to capitalize on break points give him a tactical advantage. Broady will need to improve his serve and reduce double faults to have a chance in this match.

• Final score in sets: 2:0
• Predicted winner of each set: Set 1: Z. Svajda, Set 2: Z. Svajda
• Expected aces: 5
• Double faults: 2
• Break points: 4

Expect Svajda to dominate the baseline exchanges and utilize his powerful serve to pressure Broady. If Svajda can maintain his first serve percentage above 60%, he should be able to control the match tempo effectively.

3 Reasons Why Z. Svajda Will Win

• Projected Sets Edge. The numeric forecast favors Z. Svajda 2:0 in sets, reflecting a confident path to the win.
• Match Context Edge. A combination of form, experience and tournament context favors Z. Svajda.
• Pressure Points. In recent matches, Z. Svajda has looked slightly sharper in deciding games and late-set scenarios than L. Broady, which can swing tight scorelines.